AtlanticPulse

National perspective. Local focus. Research-backed insight.

Research

Texas cities grew. Their workforces did not keep up.

· Retrospective edition

Editorial artwork: Texas cities grew. Their workforces did not keep up.

The noose, measured in payrolls

Texas’s biggest cities spent this week sounding like they had run out of money in a state that keeps adding people. Dallas faces a $51 million gap and plans more than 100 layoffs. Fort Worth is looking at $94 million. San Antonio is staring at $158 million over two years and its first property-tax increase in more than three decades. Austin already raised its rate to the legal maximum without another vote. The Texas Tribune’s reporting traces the squeeze to slower sales-tax collections, falling or flattening appraisals, public-safety pay, and a state cap that limits how much extra property-tax revenue cities can collect without going to voters — 3.5 percent a year.

That cap is a political argument. The payrolls are not. Bureau of Labor Statistics state employment files show Texas local government — cities, counties, and local school districts — employed 1.43 million people in July 2026, seasonally adjusted. That is 5.8 percent more than in July 2019. Over the same seven years, Texas total nonfarm payrolls rose 12.7 percent, and construction jobs rose 18.7 percent. BEA population estimates put the state’s resident count at 31.7 million in 2025, 9.9 percent above 2019. The public workforce that runs libraries, police departments, water systems, and classrooms added about 78,000 jobs. The rest of the Texas job market added about 1.63 million.

None of that proves the revenue cap caused the gaps Dallas and San Antonio are now briefing. It does show a long, measurable mismatch: the private economy and the population grew; the local public payroll did not keep pace. Rice University’s John Diamond told the Tribune he could not see an “out.” The employment file is less theatrical. It just keeps counting.

Texas local government jobs lag the private economy

Line chart showing Texas construction and total nonfarm payrolls rising faster than population since 2010, while Texas local-government jobs rise more slowly and U.S. local-government jobs barely move.
Index of Texas local-government employment, total nonfarm payrolls, construction jobs, and population, plus U.S. local-government employment, all set to 2010 = 100. Employment series are calendar-year averages of seasonally adjusted monthly data (2026 is January–July). Population is BEA annual through 2025. Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State and Area Employment; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, annual state personal income and population.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yeartx_local_gov_indextx_total_nonfarm_indextx_construction_indexus_local_gov_indextx_population_indextx_local_gov_thousandstx_total_nonfarm_thousandstx_construction_thousandsnote
200082.3691.18100.5291.3882.991047.89461.6567.3calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200184.4191.98102.8793.5684.471073.99544.5580.6calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200286.8591.04100.6795.3985.941104.99446.7568.2calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200388.3790.697.7596.1287.291124.39401.1551.7calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200489.1491.8196.4596.7388.731134.19526.8544.4calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200590.5994.18100.4597.6790.251152.69772567calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200691.7697.32107.2198.5592.561167.410098.5605.1calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200793.51100.51114.7399.994.431189.610429.4647.6calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200896.13102.58119.25101.3296.321222.910643.5673.1calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
200998.4199.67105.92101.2398.27125210342.1597.8calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
20101001001001001001272.210376.3564.4calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
201198.47102.2399.9498.45101.541252.810607.4564.1calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
201296.92105.21103.5297.68103.231233.110916.8584.3calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
201398.14108.36108.6497.6104.741248.611243.6613.2calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
201499.87111.75115.4898.03106.61270.611595.2651.8calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2015101.64114.37121.1398.73108.541293.111867.1683.6calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2016103.6115.8124.199.63110.25131812016.1700.4calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2017104.55117.88126.2100.02111.691330.212231.4712.3calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2018105.16120.68131.1100.73112.961337.912522.2739.9calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2019106.03123.49137.22101.41114.341348.912813.3774.5calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2020104.09118.27130.6196.81115.851324.212271.9737.2calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2021104.43122.66130.6996.85117.171328.612727.9737.6calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2022106.69129.86138.7998.91119.331357.413474.8783.4calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2023109.64134.15145.88101.4121.721394.913919.6823.4calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2024112.22136.38152.31103.78124.091427.714150.9859.6calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2025112.92137.83159.46105.06125.641436.614301.8900calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment
2026112.99138.88162.65105.491437.514410.89182026 Jan-Jul average of seasonally adjusted monthly employment

A thinner public layer on a thicker state

Scale the jobs by population and the squeeze is clearer. In 2010, Texas had 50.4 local-government jobs for every 1,000 residents. By 2019 that was 46.8. In 2025 it was 45.3. The United States, using the same method on national payrolls and BEA population, sat at 44.2 local-government jobs per 1,000 people in both 2019 and 2025. Texas still staffs a bit more heavily than the country. The extra layer has been sanded down.

Local government’s share of Texas nonfarm jobs slipped from 12.3 percent in 2010 to 10.5 percent in 2019 and 10.0 percent in 2025. That is not a collapse. It is a slow leak while the state added 6.5 million people after 2010. U.S. local-government employment rose only 3.9 percent from July 2019 to July 2026, so Texas is not uniquely stingy by national standards. It is uniquely busy. A state that grew almost 10 percent in six years cannot run 2010-sized city halls at 2010 staffing ratios and expect the same libraries to stay open.

The BLS local-government total is an awkward instrument for a mayor. School districts dominate it. A Dallas library-hour cut and an Austin ISD classroom hire live in the same number. That is a feature as well as a bug. When Texas cities complain they are being asked to police, pave, and educate a larger state on a capped tax base, the combined local public payroll is the workforce that actually does those things.

Fewer local-government workers for each Texas resident

Line chart showing Texas local-government jobs per 1,000 residents falling from about 50 in 2010 to 45 in 2025, converging toward the U.S. rate near 44.
Local-government jobs per 1,000 residents in Texas and the United States. Jobs are calendar-year averages of seasonally adjusted BLS payrolls; population is BEA annual. Local government includes cities, counties, and school districts. Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State and Area Employment; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, annual state personal income and population.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yeartexas_local_gov_jobs_per_1000_residentsus_local_gov_jobs_per_1000_residentstexas_local_gov_share_of_nonfarm_pct
200050.0346.5611.07
200150.3747.211.25
200250.9447.6811.7
200351.0347.6411.96
200450.6447.4911.9
200550.647.5111.79
200649.9847.4811.56
200749.9247.6811.41
200850.3147.911.49
200950.4847.4412.11
201050.4146.4712.26
201148.8845.3911.81
201247.3344.6811.3
201347.2444.311.11
201447.2344.1510.96
201547.244.110.9
201647.3744.1610.97
201747.1944.0310.88
201846.9344.0810.68
201946.7544.1510.53
202045.2941.9710.79
202144.9341.9310.44
202245.0742.5710.07
202345.4143.2910.02
202445.5943.8810.09
202545.344.1910.04

Austin sprinted. City staffing jogged.

The mismatch is not evenly spread. Using 12-month averages to smooth the school-year swing in unadjusted metro data, Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos added total nonfarm jobs at a 28.2 percent clip from the year ending July 2019 to the year ending July 2026. Local-government jobs there rose 14.4 percent. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington grew 16.4 percent overall and 8.8 percent in local government. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands: 11.2 percent versus 9.5 percent. San Antonio-New Braunfels is the exception that proves the pattern — 11.2 percent overall, 11.3 percent in local government. It matched. The others did not.

Plot those four metros and Austin sits farthest from a one-for-one line. That is the same city whose voters rejected a tax increase, then watched the council take the rate to the cap anyway, adding $195 a year for a typical home. San Antonio, considering a $2.95-a-month bump and $90 million in cuts, at least grew its local public payroll in line with the metro. Dallas, planning layoffs and shorter library hours while hiring toward 700 more officers, is the large metro where private payrolls lapped city and school staffing by the widest gap after Austin.

Metro totals still mix suburbs, counties, and independent school districts. They are not the City of Dallas budget. They are the labor market those budgets hire from. When city managers say public safety is eating everything else, the employment file is consistent with a workforce that grew, just not as fast as the tax base they were told would grow forever.

Austin and Dallas grew much faster than their city workforces

Grouped horizontal bar chart comparing local-government and total-nonfarm job growth in Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio from 2019 to 2026.
Percent change from the 12 months ending July 2019 to the 12 months ending July 2026. Local-government jobs are not seasonally adjusted (school calendars move the summer); total nonfarm is seasonally adjusted. Both use 12-month averages. Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State and Area Employment.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
metrolocal_government_pcttotal_nonfarm_pct
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos14.428.2
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington8.816.4
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands9.511.2
San Antonio-New Braunfels11.311.2

Where private payrolls boomed, city staffing lagged furthest

Scatter plot of four Texas metros with total nonfarm job growth on the x-axis and local-government job growth on the y-axis. Austin sits farthest to the right with the largest gap.
Each metro’s 12-month-average growth in total nonfarm jobs versus local-government jobs, July 2019 to July 2026. A point on the dashed 45-degree thought line would mean city and school payrolls kept pace with the private economy. Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State and Area Employment.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
metrototal_nonfarm_pctlocal_government_pct
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington16.48.8
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands11.29.5
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos28.214.4
San Antonio-New Braunfels11.211.3

Pay went up. Housing went up faster.

The people who do work for Texas local government are not cheaper. BEA compensation paid by local government rose from $87.2 billion in 2019 to $109.1 billion in 2024, about $76,400 per worker, up from $64,700. That 18 percent jump in pay per job is why a modest headcount increase can still blow a hole in a budget that is not allowed to collect 18 percent more property tax. The Tribune noted police and firefighter raises and overtime as a major driver. The compensation line of the income accounts agrees, without naming a union.

Households on the other side of the counter had their own problem. Nominal per capita personal income in Texas rose 35.8 percent from 2019 to 2025, to $72,364, a hair slower than the national 37.5 percent. After regional prices, real per capita income (2017 dollars) was up 11.2 percent from 2019 to 2024. Per-person spending on housing and utilities, including the imputed rent on owner-occupied homes, rose 41.5 percent over those five years, to $9,999. Housing’s share of per capita income went from 13.3 percent to 14.3 percent. The country saw a similar lift in the housing bill, 36.6 percent, but Texas closed part of a long discount: the state’s housing regional price parity rose from 88.0 in 2008 to 95.8 in 2019 and 96.5 in 2024, still below the U.S. average of 100.

That combination — a housing cost that outran real income, and a local public payroll whose pay outran its headcount — is the household version of the briefing in Dallas City Hall. An Austin homeowner paying $195 more to the city is also paying more for the house itself. Diamond’s warning that inflation and a slower economy will not let up soon is not visible as a recession in the job count. It is visible as a cost structure. Construction employment, the industry that is supposed to grow the tax base the Tribune’s housing experts want, is 62.6 percent above July 2010. Local government is 12.2 percent above. The buildings arrived. The staff to serve them did not, not in matching numbers.

Housing bills outran real Texas incomes after 2019

Line chart showing Texas housing-and-utilities spending per person rising to about 142 by 2024 from a 2019 base of 100, while real per capita income reaches only about 111.
Texas per-person spending on housing and utilities, nominal per capita personal income, and real per capita personal income (constant 2017 dollars), all indexed to 2019 = 100. Housing and utilities include imputed rent on owner-occupied homes. Sources: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, personal consumption expenditures by state; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, annual state personal income and population; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, regional price parities and real personal income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yearhousing_pce_per_capita_indexnominal_pcpi_indexreal_pcpi_index
200877.2774.7988.01
200977.3969.982.82
201080.0873.0484.21
201181.1678.7389.15
201280.6882.3590.85
201383.3783.3590.37
201486.4887.7593.53
201588.5187.7993.58
201690.8786.191.1
201792.4591.0995.37
201895.9196.3998.49
2019100100100
2020104.86102.92101.6
2021111.21113.38107.83
2022123.33119.69107.85
2023132.62126.75110.25
2024141.55130.96111.23
2025135.84

What the cap cannot explain

Two honest limits. First, these figures cannot say the 3.5 percent revenue cap caused the gaps. Texas local-government jobs per 1,000 residents were already falling in the 2010s, before the current cap. The post-2019 period continued a slide rather than inventing one. Second, city property-tax collections are not in this catalogue. BEA “personal current taxes” paid to local governments are a different concept — they omit the property taxes that NIPA treats as taxes on production — and were not used. What is measured is the workforce cities and school districts employ, the population they serve, the pay they offer, and the housing costs their residents carry.

The payoff for readers of this week’s budget fights is modest and useful. Texas did not stop hiring local public workers. It hired them more slowly than it hired everyone else, and more slowly than it added residents, while paying those workers more and while housing took a larger share of income. Dallas cutting library hours to protect police overtime is not a paradox in that file. It is what a 5.8 percent public headcount increase looks like next to a 12.7 percent private one, on a tax instrument the Legislature has deliberately blunted. If the next session tightens the cap further, as Gov. Greg Abbott wants, the employment series will not need a press release to record the sequel. It will just print a smaller number next July.

Sources and methods

This is retrospective enrichment using pinned catalogue snapshots, not a reconstruction of what was knowable on the 17 August 2026 edition date. Later revisions may be present.

Research date of the extracts: 11 September 2026. Historical edition date: 17 August 2026.

Employment: BLS State and Area Employment (SAE) and Current Employment Statistics (CES), snapshot 24 August 2026 (release id bls-sm-snapshot-2026-08-24 / bls-ce-snapshot-2026-08-24). Statewide Texas local government, total nonfarm, and construction, and U.S. local government, are seasonally adjusted monthly series, January 2000–July 2026. Metro local-government series are not seasonally adjusted; 12-month averages ending July 2019 and July 2026 are used so school-year summer drops do not dominate. Metro total nonfarm series are seasonally adjusted and averaged over the same windows. Local government includes cities, counties, and local school districts. Missing values were skipped, not treated as zero. Duplicate annual/monthly SAE encodings of the same source series were not mixed.

Population, nominal per capita personal income, and local-government compensation: BEA SAINC annual state accounts, release bea-regional-state-annual-2026-04-09, years 2000–2025 where published. Compensation ends in 2024. Units preserved (persons; dollars; thousands of dollars). Compensation per worker divides annual compensation by the calendar-year average of seasonally adjusted local-government employment.

Real per capita personal income (constant 2017 dollars) and housing regional price parities: BEA SARPI/SARPP, release bea-rpp-2026-02-19, years 2008–2024. Housing RPP is an index with United States = 100.

Housing and utilities personal consumption expenditures per capita: BEA SAPCE, release bea-sapce-2025-09-26, years 2000–2024. The series includes tenant rent, imputed rent on owner-occupied dwellings, farm and group housing, and household utilities. It is not a property-tax bill.

BEA personal current taxes paid to local governments were inspected and not used; they are not a measure of city property-tax collections.

No causal claim is made about the 3.5 percent revenue cap, appraisal protests, or any single ordinance. Comparisons are descriptive. Aggregate payrolls are not household averages. Metro areas are not city corporate limits.

Research completed 2026-09-11, for the August 17, 2026 news edition. This is retrospective analysis, not a reconstruction of information available that day.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, State and Area Employment: Source 1, Source 2
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics: Source 1, Source 2
  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, annual state personal income and population: Source 1, Source 2
  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, regional price parities and real personal income: Source 1, Source 2
  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, personal consumption expenditures by state: Source 1, Source 2

Read the related State-News edition →