AtlanticPulse

National perspective. Local focus. Research-backed insight.

Research

California’s tax base did not pack up with the moving vans

· Retrospective edition

Editorial artwork: California’s tax base did not pack up with the moving vans

A one-seventh economy is still a one-seventh economy

California voters are being asked to do something no other state has done: levy a one-time 5 percent tax on residents with more than $1 billion in net worth, retroactive to January 1, 2026. Supporters, including the Service Employees International Union, say the money would go to health care and education. Critics, including investor Mark Cuban, warn that founders and capital will leave. Reporting this week paired that fight with Internal Revenue Service county-level migration figures showing large net losses of tax filers from Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The implied story is simple: the Golden State is already leaking taxable people, and a wealth tax would open the tap.

Official state accounts tell a less cinematic story about the size of what remains. In 2025, California personal income was $3.59 trillion, or 13.73 percent of the U.S. total of $26.11 trillion, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. That share is a bit higher than in 2000 (13.08 percent). Inflation-adjusted GDP, which measures production inside the state rather than income received by residents, was $3.39 trillion in chained 2017 dollars, or 14.21 percent of the U.S. total — up from 12.66 percent in 2000. The income share peaked at 14.13 percent in 2020 and the GDP share at 14.63 percent in 2021; both eased, then stabilized. A state that still accounts for about one-seventh of the national economy is not a rounding error, even if some of its famous residents have a Texas ZIP code in the group chat.

Among the four largest states in this comparison, California’s 2025 personal-income total was still in a league of its own: $3.59 trillion against $2.29 trillion in Texas, $1.79 trillion in Florida and $1.78 trillion in New York. Those are current-dollar aggregates, not household paychecks, and they do not identify billionaires. They do mean that a tax aimed at a thin slice of California wealth is being debated against a backdrop of an enormous remaining base, not a vanished one. BEA personal income is residence-based. If a founder actually moves, the income eventually leaves the California total. If the founder stays and complains on social media, it does not.

California’s share of U.S. personal income and real GDP, 2000–2025

Line chart of California’s percent share of U.S. personal income and real GDP from 2000 to 2025, both series near 13 to 14 percent.
California still accounts for about one-seventh of U.S. personal income and a slightly larger share of inflation-adjusted GDP. The income share dipped after 2021 but remained above its 2000 level in 2025. Personal income is residence-based; GDP is production-based. Sources: BEA Annual State GDP and Income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yearpi_share_pctgdp_share_pctca_pi_billionsus_pi_billionsca_rgdp_billionsus_rgdp_billions
200013.0812.661127.68620.21784.314096
200113.0112.541169.48990.11784.614230.7
200212.9812.591187.39146.71821.514472.7
200313.0912.741240.69474.71895.314877.3
200413.1412.671315.210008.91956.715449.8
200513.1712.771387.910540.82042.115988
200613.2212.91493.211291.42120.416433.1
200713.0912.941561.3119252168.916762.4
200812.7813.061588.312423.42192.316781.5
200912.7712.911539.812058.32110.716349.1
201012.8312.83161012547.52153.916789.8
201112.8812.861713.413299.82192.917052.4
201213.0512.931814.813905.72255.417442.8
201313.0913.141840.914063.32340.317812.2
201413.2313.31955.714778.22428.718261.7
201513.5613.54209715467.1254618799.6
201613.7913.712191.115884.72623.719141.7
201713.7813.972295166592740.619612.1
201813.7714.122411.117514.4285120193.9
201913.8414.342539.718349.62969.620715.7
202014.1314.452770.519613.12930.720284.5
202114.0514.633019.221484.23151.121532.4
202213.6414.263021.622144.83147.222075.9
202313.514.13182.823577.2320422723.7
202413.6614.163400.224897.63306.923358.4
202513.7314.213585.926109.83388.923850.4

Personal income in four large states, 2025

Horizontal bar chart of 2025 personal income in billions of dollars for Florida, New York, Texas and California.
California’s $3.59 trillion in personal income in 2025 remained far larger than Texas ($2.29 trillion), Florida ($1.79 trillion) or New York ($1.78 trillion). Figures are millions of current dollars converted to billions. Aggregate dollars are not household averages. Sources: BEA Annual State GDP and Income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
statepersonal_income_billions
New York1777.2
Florida1793.5
Texas2294.6
California3585.9

The clearer split is people, not the dollar totals

Where California has lagged is headcount. BEA midyear resident population, the denominator for per capita income, shows California up 5.4 percent from 2010 to 2025 — from 37.3 million to 39.4 million. The United States grew 10.5 percent over the same span. Texas grew 25.6 percent, to 31.7 million, and Florida 24.5 percent, to 23.5 million. New York grew 3.0 percent. Indexed to 2010, California’s line flattened after 2019, dipped in 2021–22, and had not recaptured its 2019 level by 2025. That is consistent with a state that is still huge and still growing slowly, not with a state that emptied out.

Population is not the same as the IRS tax-filer counts in this week’s coverage, and it is not a count of billionaires. A family that leaves takes one or more people and some income; a high earner who leaves takes fewer people and more income. The BEA series cannot separate those cases. What it can say is that California’s resident population has grown much more slowly than the two large, no-income-tax states that dominate the relocation conversation, while the state’s income and output shares of the U.S. totals have not collapsed. The moving vans are real. They have not, so far, taken California’s seventh of the national pie with them.

Population since 2010: California versus Texas, Florida and New York

Line chart of population indexes from 2010 to 2025 for California, Texas, Florida, New York and the United States.
Indexed to 2010 = 100 using BEA midyear resident population. Texas and Florida grew about 25 percent through 2025; California grew 5.4 percent, less than the national 10.5 percent, and New York grew 3 percent. Population is not the same as taxpayer migration. Sources: BEA Annual State GDP and Income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yearCaliforniaTexasFloridaNew_YorkUnited_States
200091.18385.297.891.2
200192.484.586.898.392.1
200293.485.988.698.593
200394.587.390.298.793.8
200495.388.792.498.794.6
20059690.394.798.595.5
200696.592.696.498.496.4
200797.194.497.598.597.4
200898.196.398.398.998.3
20099998.39999.499.2
2010100100100100100
2011100.9101.5101100.9100.8
2012101.7103.2102.3101.7101.6
2013102.6104.7103.5102.4102.4
2014103.5106.6105103103.2
2015104.4108.5106.9103.4104
2016105.1110.3109103.7104.8
2017105.6111.7110.8103.9105.6
2018105.9113112.1104.1106.2
2019106114.3113.3104.1106.7
2020105.9115.8114.6103.6107.2
2021104.9117.2115.9102.1107.3
2022104.8119.3119101.5108
2023105121.7121.7101.9108.8
2024105.5124.1123.5103109.9
2025105.4125.6124.5103110.5

Those who stayed got richer, after prices

If fewer additional people are arriving, are the people already there worse off? Price-adjusted incomes say no, at least on average. BEA’s real per capita personal income puts each state’s income into constant 2017 dollars using regional price parities, so California’s expensive housing is not ignored. From 2008 to 2024, that measure rose 43.9 percent in California, to $63,028, compared with 29.2 percent for the United States ($59,195), 32.9 percent for New York ($64,153), 32.1 percent for Florida ($57,131) and 26.4 percent for Texas ($58,219). The California line jumped during the pandemic, cooled in 2022, and by 2024 was still the strongest of this group on a 2008 baseline. These are averages. They mix wages, proprietors’ income, dividends, interest, rent and transfers, then divide by every resident, including children. They are not proof that a typical renter is thriving, and they are not a billionaire series.

Prices remain the other half of the argument. In 2024, California’s all-items regional price parity was 110.7 — about 11 percent above the national average. New York was 107.9, Florida 103.4, Texas 97.1. Housing is the sharp edge: California’s housing RPP was 154.3, against 122.1 in Florida and 96.5 in Texas. Plot 2024 prices against real per capita income and the four states do not line up as a simple “cheap equals poor, expensive equals rich” diagonal. New York combined high prices with the highest real per capita income of the four. California was the most expensive and close behind New York on real income. Texas was cheaper than the nation and still below California on real per capita income. A founder who moves to Austin may buy a larger house. That is not the same as California having already lost the income that a wealth tax would try to tap.

California already taxes personal income at a scale that dwarfs many states’ entire budgets. In 2024, state government income taxes paid by California residents were $124.7 billion, or 3.67 percent of personal income, compared with $54.6 billion and 3.21 percent in New York. Texas and Florida recorded zero, as expected in states without a broad individual income tax. The 2024 California take was down from a 2021 peak of 4.45 percent of personal income, a reminder that capital-gains-heavy tax collections swing. A one-time tax on net worth above $1 billion is a different base, aimed at a different slice of people, and BEA data cannot score it. What the accounts can score is the ground under the fight: a state that is still one of the world’s large economies, whose population growth has lagged the Sun Belt alternatives, whose remaining residents have seen faster real per capita income growth than the nation, and which already runs a large income tax. The wealth-tax debate is about whether to put another instrument on that base, not about whether the base is gone.

Real per capita personal income, 2008–2024

Line chart of real per capita personal income indexes from 2008 to 2024 for California, Texas, Florida, New York and the United States.
Constant 2017 dollars, adjusted for regional price parities and national inflation, indexed to 2008 = 100. California’s remaining residents saw a 43.9 percent rise through 2024, faster than the U.S. (29.2 percent) and Texas (26.4 percent). This is not household income and does not isolate billionaires. Sources: BEA Regional Price Parities and Real Income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
yearCaliforniaTexasFloridaNew_YorkUnited_States
2008100100100100100
200996.894.195.398.696.5
201099.395.798.8101.497.8
2011102.4101.3100102.4100.3
2012105.4103.299.8105.3102.1
2013104.7102.797.7104.3101.2
2014108.4106.3101.3106.9104
2015114.3106.3105.6110.1107.8
2016118.3103.5106.6112108.8
2017120.1108.4111.3117.4111.3
2018122.2111.9115.4119.3114
2019127.7113.6120.5121.7117.2
2020137115.4124.6126.8123.3
2021144.7122.5131.3132.7129.6
2022135122.5127.5128.6124.6
2023137.3125.3129.8130.7126.8
2024143.9126.4132.1132.9129.2

Prices versus real per capita income, 2024

Scatter plot of 2024 regional price parities versus real per capita personal income for California, New York, Florida and Texas.
Regional price parities (U.S. = 100) against real per capita personal income in constant 2017 dollars. California combined the highest prices among these four states (110.7) with real per capita income of $63,028, just behind New York. Texas was cheaper (97.1) with lower real per capita income than California. Four states only; not a national ranking. Sources: BEA Regional Price Parities and Real Income.
Download exact data
View exact chart values
staterppreal_pcpireal_pcpi_thousands
California110.76302863.03
New York107.96415364.15
Florida103.45713157.13
Texas97.15821958.22

Sources and methods

This is retrospective enrichment using pinned BEA snapshots, not a reconstruction of what was knowable on the 2026-08-16 edition date. Later releases and revisions may be present.

Research was run on 2026-09-11 against catalogue extracts from bea_regional_state_annual (release bea-regional-state-annual-2026-04-09; snapshot created 2026-08-31) and bea_regional_prices (release bea-rpp-2026-02-19; snapshot created 2026-08-31).

Observation periods used: calendar years 2000–2025 for annual personal income, real GDP and population; 2008–2024 for real per capita personal income and regional price parities; 2000–2024 for state government income taxes. Taxes and RPPs are not published through 2025 in these extracts.

Personal income is residence-based and measured in millions of current dollars. Real GDP is production-based, millions of chained 2017 dollars. Population is midyear residents. Real per capita personal income is in constant 2017 dollars after regional price parities. RPPs are indexes with the U.S. equal to 100. State income taxes are thousands of current dollars; shares of personal income convert taxes from thousands and income from millions into percent. Texas and Florida zeros are reported values, not missing data.

California’s share of U.S. totals uses BEA United States as the denominator. Population and real-income indexes use 2010 = 100 and 2008 = 100 respectively. Comparisons are limited to California, Texas, Florida, New York and the United States; they are descriptive and not a ranking of all 50 states.

BEA personal income is not household income, not a billionaire wealth register, and not IRS migration. No causal effect of a wealth tax, of housing costs, or of interstate moves is inferred. Aggregate dollars are not household averages. Missing observations were not treated as zero except where the source reports zero.

Research completed 2026-09-11, for the August 16, 2026 news edition. This is retrospective analysis, not a reconstruction of information available that day.

Read the related State-News edition →